List of contents
- The physical space
- The Space corpuscle system that is coupled to masses
- The static qualities of matter
- Monads and universes
- The dynamic qualities of matter
- Introduction
- The movement of corpuscles - the time corpuscle
- The role of time as an organizing principle
- The cyclical world process
- Force, energy, gravitation
- Universes and globes
- The objects as a basis
- The feeling monad
- Astral and causal corpuscles
- The physical space
- The Space corpuscle system that is coupled to masses
- The static qualities of matter
- Monads and universes
- The dynamic qualities of matter
- Introduction
- The movement of corpuscles - the time corpuscle
- The role of time as an organizing principle
- The cyclical world process
- Force, energy, gravitation
- Universes and globes
- The objects as a basis
- The feeling monad
- Astral and causal corpuscles
The question is: How can corpuscles build a relationship with each other? The answer is easy as long as space exists. The corpuscles swim around in space and sometime bump into other corpuscles. That can happen directly, or aided by the fact that every corpuscle builds up a kind of field around itself. There are different models of corpuscles with different qualities. From that results the variety of appearances.
However what if there is no space? And that is what we found. We remember: the geometrically space or Einstein’s space does not exist. A correct, normal space of the old kind does not exist. What next? Firstly, one would expect the material corpuscles to be placed into a kind of bag in a completely disorderedly way, and that they exist in the bag side by side, without any order – just like the elements of a mathematical set that do always subject to an order either.
On the other hand we know that in nature, whether with or without space, there is a distance between the objects of reality. If this space is disestablished, there must be an object that substitutes space in which distances are created between objects. Otherwise there would not be any movement between the objects, and hence no temporality. Reality could therefore only be interpreted in a static way.
If I have two corpuscles that are not arranged in any space but that still show a distance to each other, the only possibility that remains is to declare a distance between the two initial corpuscles by counting the corpuscles that are placed between them. That means in last consequence: Reality consists of corpuscles that are close-packed and are connected with each other.
The corpuscles therefore cling to each other, always one to the other, to the other, to the other. They are connected from the bottom, to the right and to the left, to the top and to the back. All of reality is a compound of corpuscles. There are no gaps. There are always corpuscles in other corpuscles’ surroundings. The concatenated corpuscles then form something like a distance.
The distance is then given by the number of corpuscles that are concatenated between the two initial corpuscles. Because overall the corpuscles don’t have any normal order, and are therefore arranged chaotically, the exact distance cannot be exactly indicated in any concrete case. The distance simply depends on the choice above which concatenation of corpuscles I measure the distance.
Therefore reality is a compound of corpuscles that can be interpreted as something similar to space. But there is something else we need to consider: physics assumes that a vacuum or empty space exists between the material corpuscles. We just need to think of an individual atom. We have the atomic nucleus in the middle around which we have some electrons that are much smaller than the atomic nucleus.
Comparing the diameter of an atom with the diameter of an atomic nucleus or an electron, the proportion is about 1: 100.000. So there is a giant amount of empty space in the atom. It is the same situation if I consider space. There also, the actual mass agglomerations are separated by gigantic amounts of empty space.
That means that the substantial material corpuscles actually swim in a vacuum which consists of a special kind of corpuscles. These corpuscles must, according to their characteristics, react completely neutrally. Their only task is being a filler between the material corpuscles to enable them to move against and with each other.
As vacuous space is exclusively built from these neutral corpuscles, I will call them space corpuscles. For every material substantial corpuscle there are a gigantic number of space corpuscles. Only the enormous number of space corpuscles makes reality become a real system of corpuscles.
As we saw, it only remains the option now to think of space as built from corpuscles in which the space corpuscles deliver the main contingent. As a static space is refuted by the Michelson experiment, only a space system coupled to involved masses comes into consideration. This is formed by the corpuscles contained in the system. Because one can suppose a chaotic order of these corpuscles amongst each other, the independence of the direction of light diffusion is a guaranteed priory.
Let's once again consider the thought experiment of a missile flying in the direction of Pluto. In our model the earth is to be considered a stationary space corpuscle system. The missile also represents a space corpuscle system, this is however restricted to the measurements of the missile and is therefore of secondary importance. That means: I can indeed relativistically convert the missile into the earth system as long as it stays in the earth system. I cannot, however, convert the earth system into the missile system because the earth as an entity is not contained in the missile system.
According to the gained result, every planet, every planetary system, every galaxy forms its own space. If one assumes that there are even further agglomerations of galaxies, called globes, they also represent their own space. It is possible that there are globes of higher rank which unite gigantic sets of globes of the next lower rank in themselves.
All these space structures are bent back into themselves, therefore physically completed in considerable measure. A transfer of objects from one to the other space system is only possible under special conditions.
However, not only macroscopic structures have their own space according to this idea. The atom, the atomic nucleus, and the different elementary particles will also have their own space, that is quite sure. That also is the explanation for why the enormous forces created by the on the inside assembled articles do not cause neither the atomic nucleus nor the atom to explode.
For the explosive forces occurring in the traditional corpuscle model of physics are so enormous that the physical so-called science has not even a close explanation for the considerable stability of the atom and the atomic nucleus.
One will realize that the investigation of the specific qualities of the system of space corpuscle that is carried along must remain reserved for the future physics. Only the basic necessity that such a space system is the only possible space principle can established at this point. All questions that reach out above the philosophical field must remain unanswered.
However, one thing for sure: the here postulated space corpuscles are indeed arranged chaotically. Nevertheless they must be part of the system of matter, therefore woven into the entire association of all material corpuscles. Because this connection of the space corpuscles amongst each other basically falls into the category of material corpuscles, it will also be discussed there.
Now what qualities does matter have? In order to figure that out we need to remember that the condition of finiteness has to be valid for all physical objects. If I break an object and split it up again and again, that procedure has to end at some point. First the molecules will appear, then the atoms, then the elementary particles and finally the corpuscles, which Leibniz called ‘monads’.
The monads are the end of the procedure. They are undivided by definition, and are therefore the smallest elements of nature. While I can assign an extension to things that are put together, monads do not possess any extensions. Because extended means that two different parts can be distinguished in the monad that exist separately. That is, however, forbidden by definition. Therefore monads have to be regarded as objects which consist of individual, connected points.
I am sure that the reader’s imagination will be strained badly at this point. How can a number of points represent the smallest material object in reality. At this point I must remind the reader of the following principle that is still valid: An object is only perceived by the observer as what it shows to the outside. The interior qualities cannot be subject of the discovery, provided the inside is kept shut.
So it is entirely left to the reader what picture he will invent in his head about the interior of a monad and it can be regarded as completely real as long as it does not cause any inconsistencies with the qualities shown on the outside. Therefore, one may by implication consider the monad as a ball that stretches some kind of connection arms into the outside. At their ends points are located which are coupled to the interface of another monad. This explanation may be helpful for the reader’s understanding.
Before I turn to the all decisive questions, I want point something out to the benevolent reader: The following part is about the quintessence of the theory of existence. And not surprising for the basic construction of an all extensive science, the construction is somewhat difficult. I only say this so that no one thinks they can handle the problem in between two yawns.
My impression at some lectures that were about this construction was that there obviously is a fundamental problem of understanding. This seems even stranger to me personally as the same objects are dealt with in the mathematical topology and no one has any difficulties with it there.
And the topology has existed for about 100 years. It is therefore a completely accepted discipline of mathematics which supplies more or less, besides algebra, the foundation for the remaining mathematical disciplines. This is only mentioned as an annotation at this point.
Coming back to the monads. The question is: How do monads enter a relationship with each other? This does not concern the manner of how they approximate each other, but if they are already in contact with each other: how does the contact between connected monads occur? What does this contact look like?
Let's take a separate monad for this consideration. It is to be regarded as a composition of individual points. That is not all, however. The monad must be tied to other monads. Without such a connection of the monads among themselves they would be isolated, they would be entirely without structure. Reality would not exist.
We will therefore take a connection between monads as prerequisite. Directly associated or coupled monads are to be regarded as neighboring. Matter doesn’t have any other relationships than this.
The monad is to be regarded as a composition of individual points. Apparently these points are the only points where another monad could connect. Therefore the process of connection of two monads must always be achieved by linking a point of one the monads with a point of the other monad for a limited time.
The monad is to be regarded as a composition of individual points. Apparently these points are the only points where another monad could connect. Therefore the process of connection of two monads must always be achieved by linking a point of one the monads with a point of the other monad for a limited time.
And now is where it gets difficult. The monad’s four or more connection points can be connected completely independently from each other to random other monads. Because the monad is kind of blind. It cannot know in any way if its connection points are attached to a far or near monad. And even if it could obtain signals – it certainly cannot react to them because an undivided corpuscle like the monad has no logical operation that could control any action.
One must imagine that the corpuscles are gathered in a big pot. In this case the order is not important, it is basically chaotic. The minimal order results from the corpuscles being connected to each other. Only the connections are important. There are no other relationships.
There is no distance between directly connected corpuscles. Also, corpuscles only exist for one another if they are directly connected with each other. Only coupled corpuscles can have an effect on each other. All remaining corpuscle pairs are effectively infinitely far away from each other. Material space as a measured field is abolished because it has never existed. Though maybe in the physicists’ imagination.
If the monads of a local corpuscle compound only have connections within this compound, then it is due to the formation process in which the present corpuscle compound was created. That, however only concerns the monads that are regarded as the compound’s internal corpuscles.
Now we will suppose that such a corpuscle compound is closed off in a way that the monads forming it cannot escape without further ado. Nevertheless there must be connections which bind the corpuscle compound into a larger compound of corpuscles. It is possible that the connections of such corpuscle compounds are caused by a special kind of monads.
Also, in the case that two corpuscle compounds are connected, this can be called a neighborhood of coupled corpuscle compounds. But there are connections of corpuscle compounds which are out of the ordinary. This case will be discussed now.
This is matter of the connection of two so-called universes. A universe is a material compound that is so strongly separated from the outside that no corpuscle can move from the inside to the outside or vice versa. And this is valid for all cases, therefore absolute. As we will see, the universes are the where the human soul is based. Thus the universes are of highest importance.
These universes that were assigned to us require a connection to the great universe in which our bodies are located. Because if the universes are not connected to one another, they do not exist at all for each other. The connection of the universes to each other is initiated by special corpuscles which are connected to both universes in equal shares.
This connection may be initiated by a specific monad that has two sets of anchorage points compared to just the one of a normal monad. Half of the points would be connected to one, the other half to the other universe. That implicates results which totally differ for the Einstein’s ideas.
The results do not necessitate any essential change compared with the existing ideas yet. But more is yet to come. As one can prove, the universes of our souls are not only attached to one point of the great universe but to several points at the same time.
If a star is about a million light-years from me, information would usually need a million years to be transferred to me from there. Given that my soul is connected to the star at the same time as to a further body. Then the signal does not go the normal way along the million light-years but takes the shortcut across the small universe that is represented by my soul. That would then be possible in a nanosecond.
That means in a simple way that Einstein’s entire construction about a world vector consisting of space and time coordinates is thrown into the garbage bin. There is nothing that can be fixed. If I can simply reduce a distances of billions of light-years to the shortest distance through the universe of soul, then the inaccuracy of simultaneous events shrinks back to nanoseconds.
As reality is finite, there are only a finite number of objects. These can only be divided a finite amount of times be until the undivided, indivisible corpuscle, the monad, is reached. Monads, the smallest corpuscles, therefore exist. They form everything that exist, therefore form reality. Reality, or the real object system, consists of monads only.
For the time being there are three kinds of monads:
- the space corpuscle,
- the matter corpuscle,
- the time corpuscle.
The vast majority of monads are space corpuscles into which, very sporadically, matter corpuscles are fitted. The time corpuscle only exists once. (I will explain time corpuscles later).
Now on to the universes! Reality is made up of closed up rooms that are bent back into themselves. Space that is made up of corpuscles that are fully exchangeable amongst each other, and that cannot be expanded without losing its quality, is called universe.
Reality, the real-object-system, is built of universes. In this case one can imagine that reality is split into two great halves: Matter exists in one, antimatter in the other half. Matter consists of one universe only, the cosmos. Antimatter consists of an enormous number of small universes, the universes of soul.
In order for these universes to avoid forming closed off parts of reality that are non-existent for each other, they must be tied together. This happens with the aid of a fourth kind of monad: the connection corpuscles.
Connection corpuscles are special matter corpuscles. They have the quality to initiate relationships between corpuscles of different universes. They cannot exchange, however, places with any of these corpuscles. That also means that no corpuscles from one universe can get to another universe through the connection corpuscles.
Information, however, can flow from universe to universe through the connection-corpuscles. For corpuscles in the other universe are able to notice the change of the relationship between the connection corpuscles and the corpuscles of the other universe.
Strictly speaking, the demonstrations in this section do not belong to the field of philosophy anymore. At least not completely. Because the exact description of the corpuscles’ movement requires extensive model computations in order to gain secure knowledge about this. That, of course, is the physic’s task. I can only present plausible constructions at this point. The ideas about gravitation are also to be understood as potential constructions.
With regard to the cyclical world process, it has to be stressed that only the exhaustion of all constructive possibilities brings clarity in this field. Only the investigation about monads and their movements facilitates a decision as to whether there is a pre-period of the cyclical world process or a cycle from the origins of the word.
I will tie in with the results of the "static qualities of matter". We had found out that the substantial corpuscles are located in a sea of space corpuscles. There, every corpuscle is connected to at least four other corpuscles. This is also valid for the space corpuscles amongst each other.
One can picture this to be similar to the Atom in Brussels. The balls represent the corpuscles, the connecting lines between the balls represent the couplings between the corpuscles. These pictures in mind, one can now ask which activities are possible for a corpuscle in reality.
Moreover, it has to be taken into consideration that out of all the corpuscles in the system only one can be in action at any given time. That is the fundamental condition. All simultaneous actions lead to a so-called deadlock, therefore to the standstill of the machine that is the reality. This must not happen. The same applies in the real system as in the computer. But one can switch off the computer and restart the machine. The real system cannot be restarted, it would stop in perpetuity.
Therefore only one corpuscle at a time in the entire real system will carry out a change. Also a simultaneous modification of the connection is not possible for the connection points. Because for this purpose, a simultaneous activation of several processes would be necessary. That, however, is not allowed to happen. The changes at the connection points must take places successively so that it seems as if the changes occur for all connection points at the same time.
Now the question is what activates the modification of a corpuscle. The only constructively satisfying possibility is the assumption that so-called time corpuscles exist. This special corpuscle exists is only once in the whole real system. It is the only corpuscle that is permanently active.
That means that the time corpuscle moves through the entire real-system along a virtual cord. That way it forces the contacted corpuscles to become active. One can imagine that all the substantial corpuscles are with two other corpuscles connected in a special way. This catena of substantial corpuscles is closed and only one catena exists.
Now the time corpuscle moves along this catenation of corpuscles. With every move it pushes itself between the contacted corpuscle’s points of anchorage and those of the other attached corpuscles. That results in an overstaffing of the contacted corpuscle’s anchorages. That forces this corpuscle to leave its position and to reconnect to the catenation in its direct surroundings.
It is possible that this chaining process turns out differently depending on the activated corpuscle’s characteristics. The direction in which a released corpuscle moves could therefore vary depending on the kind of corpuscle and its current situation. The investigation of these in fact existing principles is, however, reserved for the physics.
One thing is clear, however: There are only a few changing effects that can be achieved by a corpuscle. The only recognizable activity of corpuscles is to remove other corpuscles from their spot or to be themselves removed by another corpuscle. Or not to be able to move it, or that others are not to able to remove the concerned corpuscles. And of course the determination of direction into which the removed corpuscle moves.
One remark shall be added. In each of the time corpuscle’s circulation every monad moves. The corpuscles of light move into one direction only. Speed of light is also associated with the validity of the presented model. Unless the movement of light is restricted by any special conditions in the environment.
First of all, it is now clear that simultaneity, which Einstein regarded as so problematically, is no obstacle at all anymore. All existing objects are simultaneous. There are no two ways about this. That means that I don’t have to make any statement about chronological modification in order to find simultaneity. One case that must not occur shall be mentioned. For whatever reason this may happen: If the time corpuscle stood still then that would be the case for all objects of the real system simultaneously.
Also time doesn’t seem to represent any problems anymore. The system’s shortest unit of time is represented by one discrete circulation by the time corpuscle. With that, time is determined completely.
Unfortunately one has to assume that counting the time corpuscle’s circulations is extremely difficult, if not completely impossible. One will understand this if the number of circulation the time corpuscle finishes during one second only is considered. That is approximately a number with 100 zeros. A little too much for a physicist in an electronic lab.
Therefore, traditional methods must be used for the measurement of time. There are two that come into consideration. Firstly, time measurement by counting the number of periodical processes that succeed each other. Secondly, time definition through measurement of the distance that is covered by the light.
Time measurement by counting the periodical processes that follow each other signifies the observation of rotations. Those are, however, only possible in three-dimensional space. They are not possible in bigger areas of space. With the utmost probability, there is with no spinning of the existing corpuscles in subtle matter. In conclusion, it is not possible to get exact results for time measurement through periodic processes.
It is also not possible to achieve exact results for time measurement through measuring of covered routes due to the chaotic collocation of the corpuscles that form space. This results in an inaccuracy of time measurement that incommutably corresponds with that of Heisenberg.
Even if we see time as an organizing principle that loses its sense without the human player, it must be stated that this human instrument leads to highly doubtful results.
Considering that the number of the monad-corpuscles in the real system is finite and that there is nothing else except these corpuscles in the system, it is clear that from a certain system status Z the process is cyclical. That means it will return again and again and again to this status.
It is now crucial, what happens before this status Z. It must be considered that the real system only contains a minimum component which allows the corpuscle to make the next movement when it is activated correspondingly. There is no past stored in it as it is completely unimportant for the further modification of the system.
Therefore it is possible that for a specific state Z there are two differing previous states which then change immediately into state Z. In this case one of these two states belongs to a period, which will be run through again and again in a cyclical evolution of the system. The other state belongs to a start phase that will only be run through once. The question is: Does such a start phase exist?
If we had already passed the start phase, the problem would be an academic question. Not matter what happened in the start phase. It is dismissed and will never recur. And what occurs today is suitable to enable a full liveliness and spirituality of all souls and of God. The real system could not achieve more anyway.
Things would look differently if we were still in the start phase. Then it would be possible that the start phase of the reality only reaches the entry point of the fully cyclical evolution of the real system very late. Then any further evolution could end in a minimum set of states. The system would still be functioning but it does not produce any feeling anymore because substantial potentials are missing.
In order to make this clear, it must to be checked for all combinations of monads if their state is possible as a result of only one or two immediate previous states. If for all combinations of monads only one possible immediate previous state is possible, then a start phase of the world is not possible.
The construction of the real system is based on the idea that there is nothing in the system except the objects or the monad corpuscles. All that causes a change in the system is the replacements of one corpuscle by another. That means that there is no force with whose aid corpuscles could affect each other in the system.
If there seem to be forces in reality, then this phenomenon must have its explanation in the characteristic of the corpuscles and not in any substance that manipulates objects with other objects. The force falls into the category of the ones that do not exist. Even if one understands it as a quality of masses, or as kinetic energies of a object.
I remember the instruction at the beginning of the physics lesson when an experiment was demonstrated for the first time. At that time we were not sated from television programmes yet, so it was all very interesting for us.
Our teacher made a steel ball fall onto a polished steel sheet. The ball hit the sheet. It almost hopped up to the same height it was dropped from. It fell down again. So there was some kind of swinging motions that go up and down. That was an experiment for physical newcomers. That could be explained even to beginners like us.
Apparently, the matter was very simple - the teacher said. Before the ball is being dropped, it has a potential energy (or energy of position) in itself. When it is dropped, this energy converts into kinetic energy (or energy of motion). When the ball hits the ground it has collected the greatest energy of motion.
During the collision only the direction of motion is changed. Temporarily, some kind of deformation energy develops and vanishes straight after that. Then the whole process is reverted. The kinetic energy is successively transformed into potential energy until it is completely used up. The ball then ascends to the starting point where it stops. After that the game starts again.
So far so good. That all is quite obvious. At that time we found everything very amazing. And the teacher virtually patted himself on the back. As a reverence to Newton. Without his law of gravitation the event would apparently be impossible. Now I still have to agree with this.
Of course one wonders, quite casually, up to which size the potential energy can grow. I ask that question purely theoretically and without special intention. If one wants to send a satellite into space, one must know how much energy is needed in order to put it into orbit. This energy is commonly known and the missile oddballs are quite familiar with it, too.
As a born malcontent I don’t just simply let the missile circle, but send it on and on into space. Its flies past Saturn and Pluto, further and further, until it arrives at the gates of a black hole. "whoops-a-daisy!", says the missile before it drops itself into the super hole, "What is this? My potential energy suddenly increased by a million times. That cannot be normal."
Now that’s a bit thick! Obviously, no one had expected this. How can the potential energy grow to such a value? That is irregular. That is bad manners. Obviously the missile has another potential energy near all the stars it passes. Energy out of nowhere. That is physics, there nothing you can do about this.
Or is there? We will simply ask the new physics to see if they are capable of producing such nonsense, too. Therefore, we first have to clarify what the New Physics mean by energy. That should not be a problem, and indeed, it is not. We will start with looking at the kind of energy that represents energy most obviously. Heat.
If I put energy into an object by heating it up, its temperature increases. This is a sign of the increasing heat energy in it. In the caloric theory it is explained that the heat is produced through the movement of the corpuscles in the considered object. The higher the temperature, the greater the movements.
The New Physics assumes that there is only a velocity of the smallest corpuscles - that would be the velocity of light. The smallest corpuscles are always in bigger objects. Because they most move into different directions, the movement of the considered object is the resultant of the movements of his corpuscles.
That way heat energy in the considered object is given as a result that a certain adjustment of direction occurred in its smallest corpuscles. The stronger they move into one direction, the greater its velocity and with that its energy is. Energy is therefore only an expression of an arrangement of its corpuscles. The term energy can only be retained under this condition.
What is valid for the chaotic thermal movement of the corpuscle is also valid for the movement of an object. Only that the corpuscles here are connected among themselves and that the entire object moves as a result of the velocity of his corpuscles.
To understand what happens during the transformation from kinetic into potential energy, it must be stated first of all that the effect is based on the emergence of gravity. In this case, people must not suppose that a force works in the traditional way. Especially the idea that gravity could be a matter of tractive force that has an effect over larger distances is erroneous.
Gravity can only be caused by direct contact of special corpuscles. There are not other possibilities. In this case it is absolutely conceivable that these corpuscles expand in the form of a wave. The transmitted corpuscles cause a process of reorientation which turns the movement of the contacted corpuscles into the direction from which the gravity corpuscles came.
If one supposes that all mass permanently sends out a certain set of gravity corpuscles that will then of course spread statistically into all directions, then the caused effect must conform with Newton’s law of gravity.
It remains to be resolved how the mass systems are supplied with gravitation corpuscles. For with the necessary great number of sent out gravitation corpuscles, a possible stockpile of these corpuscles would be quickly exhausted in the mass systems.
This supply can only work smoothly if the sent out gravitation corpuscles return in some way to the masses in order to be able to be sent out anew. For this purpose space which belongs to every mass system must be formed in a corresponding manner. A simple space curved and bent in itself a la Einstein does not work.
Space must indeed be bent backwards, nevertheless it must not form any surface of a four-dimensional ball but it must be formed like a funnel. Its end part then stands perpendicular on the 3-dimensional plan of the mass system.
Because energy turns out to be some kind of arrangement, an energy formula a la Einstein is completely absurd. That would mean that an object can be converted into one of his qualities. So essence would be created from existence.
Real objects do not have any qualities in the end for they are created by humans only for the purpose of their thinking. This would mean that reality can be destroyed by integrating it into the human thinking process. That for me is part of Einstein’s fairy tale. Something to tell around the chimney in the evenings!
I would now like to deal with globes and universes. Globes are matter systems equipped with their own rooms which are, however, associated with other matter systems in a way so that a corpuscle exchange is possible between them. Globes are generally contained in another globe which is of higher order.
So one could describe the system earth as a globe of first order. The planetary or solar system would then be a globe of 2nd order. Our galaxy would be a globe of 3rd order. The spiral nebulas or galaxies would therefore be described as globes of 3rd order, too. The visible system of stars and galaxies would then be described as a globe of 4th order.
Certain seers state that there are also globes of 5th and 6th order. The existence of a central start is supposed to be the characteristic of globes. This idea is plausible looking at the pictures of galaxies. That would of course mean that even the central suns of the galaxies have gigantic dimensions. Our visible globe’s central sun would then certainly have a diameter of some millions of light years.
All these globes are contained in the material universe which represents the largest existing globe ever. This globe or universe is to be regarded, however, as only one side of reality. The other side is formed by a gigantic number of smaller universes. These universes are connected with the visible universe by a number of connection corpuscles.
In spite of this connection, the corpuscles cannot change over to the other universe. The universe is materially completed. Therefore it could also be called a perpetual motion machine.
Every universe has a monad which is capable of having feelings. It is called a feeling monad and it is connected with all non-space corpuscles of the own universe. The proof that the feeling monad exists in the great visible universe then forms proof of God’s existence.
It is time to summarize the results that have been achieved up to now at a glance:
The theory of existence has a model of physical objects as a basis. Nothing exists apart from objects. The number of objects is finite. On the one hand, the existence of every individual object is independent from the existence of another object. On the other hand, only special objects in this system of objects are capable of having feelings and therefore becoming a subject.
Should space exist, it would be an object according to the constructed model. This means that no space exists in the mathematically abstract way in which the objects are embedded. Space is built by a special kind of corpuscles, the space corpuscles. The majority of corpuscles of reality are space corpuscles which contain a little part with non space corpuscles. Besides that, the substantial corpuscles, the non space corpuscles, are to be referred to as active, the space corpuscles as passive.
Objects consist of corpuscles. As there is no space that is independent from object, the objects, and therefore also the corpuscles, must enter into relationships with each other without the arrangement of a space. The only possibility to realize this idea is: they have a common connection relationship. One can imagine the corpuscles and their connection relationships as similar to the atom in Brussels. So one can interpret the corpuscles as the balls, the connection relationships as the tubes between the balls.
Objects and also corpuscles only exist for other objects through direct connection with these. That means that objects can only have an effect on those objects that they are linked to through a connection. They only exist for each other if they have a connection. Two objects that are not currently connected through a connection do not exist for each other at that moment.
All objects of reality are indirectly connected with each other through other objects and their connections. No object can fall out of this system. If something does fall out it can never be inserted again. If it disappears once out of the system it is away in perpetuity. It can not be added to the chain again. So as nothing can enter into reality, nothing can be removed from it either. The set of corpuscles gathered in reality remains unchanged for eternity.
A corpuscle’s connection point can never end in nothingness; it is always connected to a connection point of another corpuscle. The connection can only slide from corpuscles to corpuscles. There is never an open connection, spaces bends back to the beginning so that it always has a finite size but not any borders. Reality consists of self-contained spaces with inserted non space corpuscles. These are structured into rooms which bend back again.
Taking objects as basis also means that objects do not have any components in themselves that are directed to the past. They are also only fitted with a minimum component that is directed onto the future, viz. They have a tendency to change existing connections in regularly defined form.
That happens after activation. The activation in this case is initiated by a time corpuscle which only exists once in reality. It travels permanently through the entire reality and makes contact with every non space monad exactly once on every transit.
In reality there is therefore
- no space in which the corpuscles have their mathematically defined position,
- no time as a simultaneous medium of change
- no force or energy as a cause of one corpuscle’s effect on other corpuscles.
All these things that are similar to object are only pseudo objects. They are only an imaginary size that humans use for organizing and computing real given objects. Really, only real objects and the connections between them exist. The objects’ only quality is: To have connections and to be able to change them according to their characteristics.
Because the connection corpuscles represent the single bridges between the universes, the universes remain existent in eternity.
As one can show, feelings can always occur in one monad only. This monad, called feeling monad, always stands alone in universe. It is connected with all other matter corpuscles of the universe. The matter corpuscles transmit impulses from the outside to the feeling monad. They therewith stimulate the actual feelings.
The feeling monad is not passive. It has preferred routes for the change of connections to the non space corpuscles. If these are used in the case of modifications through non space corpuscles, then positive feelings arise. In the opposite case negative feelings arise. This is also substantially proved by the feeling monad’s certain resistance towards non-preferred changes of connection.
Later I will show that every feeling creature represents its own universe which has a feeling monad as the core. This proves the immortality of the soul.
The connection of the human body and corresponding soul universe cannot function without the intermediation of two more bodies:
- the astral body or the fine-material body and
- the causal body or the hyperfine-material body.
These bodies consist of corpuscles which are much smaller than the elementary particles known in physics. Astral or fine-material corpuscles are probably 20 orders of magnitude smaller than elementary particles. Causal corpuscles and also monads are probably 20 orders of magnitude smaller than astral corpuscles.
It is the opposite in the macro scale where the coarse material universe which is solely available for astronomy is embedded in the astral or fine matter which is probably 20 orders of magnitude larger than the coarse material cosmos. Astral matter is formed from astral corpuscles that are not made of elementary particles.
Finally, the astral matter is embedded in the causal or hyperfine material cosmos. This is probable again 20 orders of magnitude larger than the astral matter. Only this should then be called universe or cosmos.